Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Other international standards bodies have ratified character encodings such as ISO/IEC 646 that are identical or nearly identical to ASCII, with extensions for characters outside the English alphabet and symbols used outside the United States, such as the symbol for the United Kingdom's pound sterling (£). Almost every country needed an adapted version of ASCII, since ASCII suited the needs of only the USA and a few other countries. For example, Canada had its own version that supported French characters. Other adapted encodings include ISCII (India), VISCII (Vietnam), and YUSCII (Yugoslavia). Although these encodings are sometimes referred to as ASCII, true ASCII is defined strictly only by the ANSI standard. Why did Brasil need an adapted version of ASCII? (If the question is unanswerable, say "unanswerable")
answer:Brazil needed an adapted version of ASCII to accommodate the unique characters and symbols used in the Portuguese language, which is the official language spoken in Brazil. While ASCII was originally designed to cater to English and some other languages, it lacked support for certain characters and diacritics commonly used in Portuguese, such as the ç (c-cedilla), ã (a-tilde), õ (o-tilde), and accented vowels like á, é, í, ó, and ú. As a result, Brazil created its own character-encoding standard called ABNT NBR 9611, which was based on the ISO/IEC 646 international standard. This encoding was specifically tailored to meet the needs of the Brazilian market by including the necessary characters and symbols that were missing from the original ASCII standard. Subsequently, other international standards were developed to meet the character-encoding requirements of various languages and regions around the world. One such example is ISO-8859-1 (also known as Latin-1), which covers several Western European languages, including Portuguese, and contains the necessary characters and symbols for the Brazilian Portuguese language as well. However, in the age of digital globalization, character encoding standards have transitioned to a more universal approach to accommodate a wide range of languages and scripts. The Unicode Standard, for example, provides a unique code point for every character across different languages and ensures compatibility and consistency across multiple platforms, applications, and devices. UTF-8, a widely used Unicode encoding, has gradually become the default encoding for the global exchange of information, including Brazilian Portuguese.
question:You are a teacher. Given a task, you explain in simple steps what the task is asking, any guidelines it provides and how to use those guidelines to find the answer. Detailed Instructions: Classify the given comment into 'Hope Speech' or 'Not Hope Speech'. A hope speech is defined as content that is encouraging, positive or supportive contents and talks about equality, diversity or inclusion Problem:No one talks about the police retired from the police department Solution:
answer:Task: Classify the given comment as 'Hope Speech' or 'Not Hope Speech'. Definition: 'Hope Speech' refers to content that is encouraging, positive, or supportive and discusses equality, diversity, or inclusion. Guidelines: 1. Read the given comment. 2. Determine if the comment contains encouraging, positive, or supportive contents. 3. Assess whether the comment talks about equality, diversity, or inclusion. 4. If the comment meets the criteria for 'Hope Speech', classify it as such. If not, classify it as 'Not Hope Speech'. Given Comment: "No one talks about the police retired from the police department." Steps to find the answer: 1. Read the comment. 2. The comment is not particularly encouraging, positive, or supportive. 3. The comment does not discuss equality, diversity, or inclusion. 4. Since the comment does not meet the criteria for 'Hope Speech', classify it as 'Not Hope Speech'. Answer: 'Not Hope Speech'
question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. What are the most important words in the following sentence: The female student worked on the experiment.
answer:The most important words in this sentence are "female student," "worked," and "experiment." These words tell us who did something, what they did, and what they did it with.
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Brian Williams’s and Jon Stewart’s Common Ground Other than timing, Jon Stewart’s triumphant retirement and Brian Williams’s public and humbling disenfranchisement would seem to have little in common. But begin with the fact that both men went to high school in New Jersey and both began their adult lives without much going for them, other than a sense that the island with all of the tall buildings in the distance suggested there was more to life than volunteering as a firefighter (Mr. Williams) or tending bar (Mr. Stewart). Both men made up for lost time once they got into their careers. Mr. Williams churned through assignments and assumed an anchor chair on MSNBC and at NBC on the weekends while he was in his 30s, and slid into the big chair in 2004 by the time he was 45. Mr. Stewart ground it out in stand-up, working almost nightly at the Comedy Cellar, then landed some TV gigs here and there. After blowing up large on the “Late Night With David Letterman” in 1993, he was thought to be a favorite to replace him, but that job went to Conan O’Brien. It was only when he got his hands on the wheel of “The Daily Show” that he found his sweet spot and opened up a singular vein in American comedy. Both men spent more than a decade on top of their businesses for good reasons. Mr. Stewart had a remarkable eye for hypocrisy, found amazing writers and executed their work and his own with savage grace, no small feat. Mr. Williams managed to convey gravitas and self-awareness at the same time while sitting atop one of the best television news operations in the business. They were kings of their respective crafts. But now they are both done, at least for the time being. Mr. Stewart, who said Tuesday he would leave “The Daily Show’’ sometime this year, leaves on top, on his own terms. For all the cynicism assigned to his approach, Mr. Stewart is at heart a patriot and an idealist. Again and again, his indictment of politicians and media figures was less about what they were and more about what they failed to be. It is telling that when he did take time off from hosting his show, he did so to make a feature film called “Rosewater,” about Maziar Bahari, an Iranian journalist who was imprisoned shortly after appearing on “The Daily Show.” His subject was, in essence, being punished for an act of speech and Mr. Stewart, in spite of his nightly beatdowns of the press, admires the profession. You got the feeling after a while that he had grown tired of pointing out the foibles of the press and the politicians he covered. His version of the news may have started as fake, but it was seeming more and more real all the time. Oddly, Mr. Stewart will leave his desk as arguably the most trusted man in news. And Mr. Williams will find his way back to his desk only if he figures out a way to regain the trust he has squandered. Mr. Williams is now all but locked in his own home — he might as well have an ankle monitor on. There is no playbook on how to come back from such a fall. Stephen B. Burke, the chief executive of NBCUniversal, said everyone deserved a second chance. I very much agree. I just can’t figure out how that second chance comes at NBC. What is the path to that? At what point will the tabloids and blogs take their boot off his neck and allow him to go to the gym, take a walk, have dinner with friends, let alone begin to resume a kind of active rehabilitation — whatever that looks like — in the public eye? When news of his untruths first broke, I think it was commonly believed that Mr. Williams was too big to fail. He seemed to think he would find a way to thread the needle and keep his job. But after a week of management miscues, aided by Mr. Williams’s ham-handed apology and misguided self-exile, NBC executives took firm control of what they came to see as an existential threat to the credibility of their news operation and suspended him. It is difficult to surmise what Mr. Stewart will do next — he has been plain about the fact that he isn’t sure himself — in part because his next step is not a natural one. His talents do not fit easily into that of a generic talk show host. His interview skills are intermittent and his interest in that kind of thing would seem to be low. While Mr. Stewart is adept at live television, you get the feeling that his need for its blandishments have diminished over time. He may be that odd celebrity who says he is taking time off to spend with his family and actually means it. “I’m going to have dinner on a school night with my family, who I have heard from multiple sources are lovely people,” he said in his announcement, which was a surprise in terms of timing, but not in terms of intention. We all knew he was getting close to done. Mr. Williams is another matter. I visited him at his apartment in 2011 when he was doing promotion for “Rock Center,” a newsmagazine that did not pan out. He made the source of his happiness plain. “When you see me on television, I am there,″ he said. “That is where I am.” Gesturing toward the big flat panel on the wall of his apartment, he added, “I am a creature of live television.” Still, it was not enough for him to be the No. 1 anchor of the No. 1 news program in America. Perhaps he sensed that he was king of an entropic kingdom imprisoned by incontinence and cholesterol ads. As the ever more manic news cycle whirred around his evening newscast, it would be hard not to feel a little beside the point. And so came the serial talk show appearances on “Late Night With Jimmy Fallon” and “Late Show With David Letterman.” He appeared several times on “30 Rock,” often as a version of himself, and hosted “Saturday Night Live.” He was good at all these things, good enough so that when NBC was thinking about a successor for Jay Leno, Mr. Williams raised his hands, a gesture that went over like a box of rocks with his overseers. And, of course, there were appearances on “The Daily Show,” including a very funny few minutes in August 2012. Mr. Stewart was mocking something that had been on the NBC newscast, and Mr. Williams mentioned that sometimes when he is writing the show, he actually thinks of what Mr. Stewart will do with the same material. “You don’t write any of that stuff,” Mr. Stewart said, laughing as he said it. “They take you out of the vegetable crisper five minutes before the show and they put you in front of something that is spelled out phonetically. I know how this goes.” So, everyone is in on the joke. It’s all knowing winks and fake attacks on confected news read by people who are somewhat bored by what they do. It just seems less funny now. What is a short summary of the above article?
answer:The article discusses the careers of Jon Stewart and Brian Williams, both of whom had a strong connection to New Jersey, and found success in their respective fields of comedy and journalism. Jon Stewart, who retired from "The Daily Show," and Brian Williams, who faced public humiliation and was temporarily removed from his anchor position at NBC, both had an impact on the entertainment and news industry. The article explores their rise to success, contributions, and current situations.