question:You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much as you can. Q:The U.S. Congress is one step closer to averting a government shutdown Thursday after the U.S. House easily passed a 1.3 trillion spending plan that would end months of the government operating under short-term spending bills. The measure, approved by a 256-167 vote, now goes to the Senate, which has until midnight Friday to approve it and avert the year’s third government closure. The massive bipartisan bill would keep the government funded until the end of September. Lawmakers had just hours to read the nearly 2,200-page bill released Wednesday night. Under Senate rules, a single senator can delay the vote but not stop it entirely. Senator Rand Paul has objected to the short time given to members to read the lengthy legislation. As of Thursday afternoon, the Senate was waiting to see how the vote would proceed, raising the prospect of another brief government shutdown. With midterm elections looming in November, the bill likely marks the final time Capitol Hill will consider major legislation this year. The measure would fulfill President Donald Trump’s vow to boost military funding but provides funding for limited parts of his immigration agenda. The bill, which the White House said Trump supports, would give Trump a huge budget increase for the military, including a 2.4 percent pay raise for military personnel. “Today marks the beginning of a new era for the United States military,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement Thursday. “This legislation fulfills our pledge to rebuild the United States military.” After extensive negotiations between Republicans and Democrats, the bill also provides 1.6 billion for physical barriers and 150 kilometers (93 miles) of a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border, short of the 25 billion Trump requested for the project he repeatedly touted on the campaign trail while pledging Mexico would pick up the cost. Who's immigration agenda has funding for limited parts of it? Pick the correct answer from the following options: A. Trump B. Mexicans C. Lawmakers D. not enough information A:

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. "Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend." is a true sentence. Does this mean that "The trainer couldn't stand her boyfriend."?

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Summarize this article: A team from Harvard Medical School compared reading paper books and light-emitting e-readers before sleep. They found it took longer to nod off with a back-lit e-reader, which led to poorer quality sleep and being more tired the next morning. Original Kindle readers do not emit light so should be fine, say experts. Experts said people should minimise light-exposure in the evening. Whether you are perusing the Man Booker shortlist or leafing through Zoella, the impact of reading on your sleep is probably the last thing on your mind. But there has been growing concern about the dangers of light before bedtime. Our bodies are kept in tune with the rhythm of day and night by an internal body clock, which uses light to tell the time. But blue light, the wavelength common in smartphones, tablets and LED lighting, is able to disrupt the body clock. Blue light in the evening can slow or prevent the production of the sleep hormone melatonin. Twelve people were locked in a sleep laboratory for two weeks. They spent five days reading from a paperback and five days from an iPad. Regular blood samples showed the production of the sleep hormone melatonin was reduced by reading an e-book. People also took longer to fall asleep, had less deep sleep and were more tired the next morning. The researchers said other e-readers such as the Nook and Kindle Fire produced similar wavelengths of light and would have the same impact. The findings were published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Lead researcher Prof Charles Czeisler told the BBC News website: "The light emitted by most e-readers is shining directly into the eyes of the reader, whereas from a printed book or the original Kindle, the reader is only exposed to reflected light from the pages of the book." He said disrupting sleep in turn affected health. "Sleep deficiency has been shown to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic diseases like obesity and diabetes, and cancer. "Thus, the melatonin suppression that we saw in this study among participants when they were reading from the light-emitting e-reader concerns us." Dr Victoria Revell, who researches the impact of light on the body at the University of Surrey, told the BBC: "This is a very good study and I think it's really interesting. "We should be advising people to minimise their [light-emitting e-reader] use in the evening, particularly teenagers who are a group that are using their phones and tablets late in to the evening." Teenagers naturally have a late body clock, which makes them slow to rise in the morning and up late at night. "People who already have a delayed body clock are delaying themselves much further and that is a very important message," Dr Revell added. Prof Czeisler agreed, saying there was "special concern" for teenagers who were already sleep deficient by being forced to get up early for school.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Translate "Despite the fact that we criticise the result of the Johannesburg Summit, it is true - and in this I agree with the committee and the rest of my fellow Members - that we need to follow up the minimum agreements to ensure that they are fulfilled." to Finnish?