Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:What is the answer for the question: What was the name of the person who took photos of Arnett's bloodied face? from the following article ? American pressmen had been alerted to an upcoming Buddhist demonstration to coincide with Double Seven Day at Chanatareansey Pagoda in the north of Saigon. The nine-man group, which included Arnett, Browne, AP photographer Horst Faas, David Halberstam, Neil Sheehan of United Press International, and CBS's Peter Kalischer and photographer Joseph Masraf waited outside the building with their equipment. After an hour-long religious ceremony, the Buddhist monks, numbering around 300, filed out of the pagoda into a narrow alley along a side street, where they were blocked and ordered to stop by plain-clothed policemen. The Buddhists did not resist, but Arnett and Browne began taking photos of the confrontation. The police, who were loyal to Ngo Dinh Nhu, thereupon punched Arnett in the nose, knocked him to the ground, kicked him with their pointed-toe shoes, and broke his camera. Halberstam, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Buddhist crisis, was a tall man, standing around 20 centimetres (8 in) taller than the average Vietnamese policeman. He waded into the fracas swinging his arms, reportedly saying "Get back, get back, you sons of bitches, or I'll beat the shit out of you!" Nhu's men ran away without waiting for a Vietnamese translation, but not before Browne had clambered up a power pole and taken photos of Arnett's bloodied face. The police smashed Browne's camera, but his photographic film survived the impact. The other journalists were jostled and rocks were thrown at them. Photos of Arnett's bloodied face were circulated in US newspapers and caused further ill-feeling towards Diem's regime, with the images of the burning Thich Quang Duc on the front pages still fresh in the minds of the public. Halberstam's report estimated that the altercation lasted for around ten minutes and also admitted that the pressmen had tried to apprehend the policeman who had smashed Browne's camera but were shielded by the rock-wielding policeman's colleagues. He also claimed that the secret policemen had also...

answer:The name of the person who took photos of Arnett's bloodied face is Browne.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Sentence from a movie review: unlikable , uninteresting , Select your answer: was the movie seen positively or negatively based on the preceding review? Select from: [1]. negative; [2]. positive;

answer:[1]. negative;

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. It sounds as if Celtics director of basketball operations Danny Ainge has been listening to one of those self-improvement tapes that repeat positive mantras. The message? quot;I am happy with my roster. I am happy with my roster. quot; It's clear he will go to great lengths (or is that great pains?) to convince fans and reporters that he is comfortable ... What best summarizes the content of the above article? Select from: *World *Sports *Business *Science/Tech

answer:The content of the above article is best summarized under the category of *Sports*. The article discusses Danny Ainge, the Celtics director of basketball operations, and his attitude towards his roster.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Who Has It Worse? BP or Goldman Sachs? The nation is transfixed by the pictures of oil spilling into the Gulf of Mexico. Of course, it wasn’t too long ago that the nation’s angst was focused on Goldman Sachs Group and the SEC’s civil suit against the Wall street investment bank. Naturally, the questions arises, who has it worse BP or Goldman? The company behind one of the largest oil spills in U.S. history or the Wall Street investment firm accused of failing to properly disclose details about a mortgage securities deal? BP will likely face more harm from the spill than Goldman will from its Abacus deal. Just look at the pictures. For nearly two months, televisions across the world have been running 24-hour web cams showing millions of gallons of crude oil spewing relentlessly in the blue waters of the Gulf of Mexico, killing wildlife and leaving tar bars on white sandy beaches. This endless reel of environment disaster images may not turn away customers from BP gas pumps (especially if BP keeps its prices lower than competitors), but it certainly hasn’t endeared the company to another important constituent: regulators. BP is the largest operator of offshore oil rigs in the Gulf, and it will need regulatory approve to keep expanding its business here. The British company had planned 10 new offshore projects in the Gulf this year. Its chances for obtaining those permits now look quite slim. President Obama said Monday he was looking for someone’s “a– to kick” over the spill, which pundits have said is now a political test of the president’s toughness. The last gigantic oil spill – the 1989 grounding of the Exxon Valdez — occurred 21 years ago, under a less environmentally hawkish administration of George H.W. Bush and before environmental issues had gained mainstream political appeal. But in today’s political environment, lawmakers and/or regulators may be more inclined to impose draconian restrictions on BP’s future U.S. business. Then there is the issue of cost. Some estimates have pegged litigation and clean-up costs at 40 billion, which is about three times BP’s annual profit. That is real money, and accounts for more than half of the 74 billion in BP lost market’s value since the spill began. By comparison, one estimate has put the cost of a Goldman settlement with the SEC at around 600 million, a mere wrist slap and fraction of the company’s annual earnings. Of course, Goldman has lost about 12 billion in market value since the SEC charges were announced in mid April. But the investment bank’s stock can retrace those losses if the capital and financial markets improve. Much of Goldman’s profits are generated from its trading prowess. That will likely remain strong regardless of the outcome of the SEC case. To be sure, Goldman’s reputation has been tarnished by the Abacus deal – which at its heart accuses the firm of selling a product that it believed was faulty. But that can’t compete with the images of oil drenched pelicans and the underwater geyser that keeps spewing and spewing. What is a short summary of the above article?

answer:This article talks about two big companies, BP and Goldman Sachs, who both had some trouble. BP had a big oil spill in the ocean that hurt animals and the environment, and Goldman Sachs had some problems with the way they handled money. The article thinks that BP has it worse because the oil spill can cause a lot of damage and cost them a lot of money to fix it. It also says that people might not trust BP as much in the future. Goldman Sachs might lose some money and their reputation, but they can still make a lot of money from other parts of their business.

Released under the GPT License.

has loaded