Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:Arthur's hobby was restoring classic cars, and he frequently attended shows at which people with similar interests would gather to display their handiwork, compare techniques and information, and view products of manufacturers who catered to such hobbyists. At one such show, Arthur was examining a 1947 Pontiac Stretch Roadster when the owner, who was standing nearby, indicated that he was trying to sell the car. Bud, who stated that he had restored the Pontiac himself, told Arthur that (I) the car was restored using nothing but genuine Pontiac parts or parts that Bud had handmade himself. He said that (II) this is the finest restoration of a 1947 'Stretch' Roadster in the United States, and one of the two best in the world.' As they were discussing price, Bud pointed out that (III) this car has the original 'rearing horse' grille that was installed by the dealer on 1947 'Stretch' Roadsters. Arthur agreed to purchase the car for a considerable sum, and had it transported to his home. Later, he discovered that Bud had not been entirely truthful about the restoration. In his action for deceit, Arthur establishes that Bud knew, when he made statements I, II, and III, above, that each was false. Assuming that all the other elements of deceit are proven, which of the three statements will support Arthur's claims? A. I only. B. I and II. C. I and III. D. I, II, and III. Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.

answer:C

question:The citizenry of East Rabbit's Foot had experienced a tremendous increase in the incidence of begging in the downtown area. In response, the city council enacted an ordinance that required anyone soliciting for charitable contributions of any sort in any public place to wear an identity card issued by the local police department. Identity cards could be obtained by filling out an affidavit providing identification and address information about the applicant and further affirming that the applicant was not soliciting for personal use and belonged to a recognized charitable organization. George, a member of Airbreathers Against Tobacco (AAT), wishes to solicit contributions by similarly minded persons for use in his organization's campaign against public smoking. He does not want to comply with the identity card ordinance. He comes to you for legal advice and asks the advisability of challenging the ordinance in federal court. You should inform George that the ordinance is probably: A. Unconstitutional, because it violates the First Amendment's prohibition of government infringement of the right of free speech. B. Unconstitutional, because it prevents religious organizations from obtaining contributions from their members, and thus interferes with the free exercise of religion. C. Constitutional, because it represents a reasonable balancing of the state's police power interest in protecting its citizens from fraud and annoyance against the right of people to seek charitable contributions. D. Constitutional, because preventing fraud in the solicitation for charitable contributions is a compelling interest. Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.

answer:A

question:Woody is on trial for embezzlement. He does not take the stand. Which of Woody's previous convictions is most likely to be admitted into evidence against him? A. A 7yearold conviction for arson, a felony. B. A 12yearold conviction for embezzlement, a felony. C. A 6monthold conviction for disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. D. A 2yearold conviction for felonious sexual assault. Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.

answer:B

question:Drew was tried for the July 21 murder of Victor. Drew called Warren to testify to an alibi. On crossexamination of Warren, the prosecutor asked, Weren't you on the jury that acquitted Drew of another criminal charge?' The best reason for sustaining an objection to this question is that: A. The question goes beyond the scope of direct examination. B. The probative value of the answer would be substantially outweighed by its tendency to mislead. C. The question is a leading question. D. Prior jury service in a case involving a party renders the witness incompetent. Choose A, B, C or D as your solution.

answer:B

Released under the GPT License.

has loaded